• Reactivity of Copper(I) Complexes with Tripodal Ligands towards O2: Structures of a Precursor [L3CuI(NCCH3)](BF4), L3 = Tris(3-isopropyl-4,5-trimethylenepyrazolyl)methane and of its Oxidation Product [L3CuII(-OH)2CuIIL3](BF4)2 with Strong Antiferromagnetic Spin-Spin Coupling
    W. Kaim, C. Titze, T. Schurr, M. Sieger, L.M. Lawson Daku, J. Jordanov, D. Rojas, A.M. García and J. Manzur
    Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 631 (13-14) (2005), p2568-2574
    DOI:10.1002/zaac.200500053 | unige:3316 | Abstract | Article PDF
The molecular structure of the highly oxygen-sensitive complex [L3CuI(NCCH3)](BF4) (1) reveals approximately symmetrical coordination by the fac-tridentate (tripodal) ligand L3 = tris(3-isopropyl-4,5-trimethylenepyrazolyl)methane and a rather short CuI-N(acetonitrile) distance of 1.865(5) Å. In CH2Cl2 at -78 °C the colourless compound reacts with O2 to yield a labile purple intermediate (λmax 517 nm) - presumably a peroxodicopper(II) complex - which decomposes at -30 °C. No such intermediate was observed on reaction of the CuI complex of bis(2-pyridylmethyl)benzylamine with O2 at -80 °C. However, an EPR spectrum with g|| = 2.17 and g_|_ = 2.03 without 63,65Cu hyperfine splitting was observed at low temperatures. Exposure of the precursor 1 to air under ambient conditions yields dinuclear [L3Cu||(μ-OH)2CuIIL3](BF4)2 (2) which exhibits an EPR detectable dissociation into monomers in CH2Cl2 solution. The structure of the hexakis(dichloromethane) solvate of 2 with Cu-Cu and Cu-O distances of 3.055 and 1.94Å, respectively, is typical for dihydroxo-bridged dicopper compounds with square-pyramidal Cu|| configuration (τ = 0.03), adopting an anti arrangement. In agreement with the relatively wide Cu-O-Cu angles of 103.5° an analysis of the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility revealed a rather strong (J = -633 cm-1) antiparallel spin-spin coupling. The effect is ascribed to the steric bulk of the ligand L3.
  • Paramagnetism of Tetranuclear Complexes between TCNX Ligands (TCNE, TCNQ, TCNB) and Four Pentaammineruthenium or Dicarbonyl(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)manganese Fragments
    E. Waldhör, W. Kaim, L.M. Lawson Daku and J. Jordanov
    Inorganic Chemistry, 32 (15) (1997), p3248-3252
    DOI:10.1021/ic960998s | unige:2965 | Abstract | Article HTML | Article PDF
The tetranuclear complexes {(μ4-TCNX)[Ru(NH3)5]4}(A)8 and (μ4-TCNX)[Mn(CO)2(C5Me5)]4 [A = PF6 or CF3SO3; TCNX = TCNE (tetracyanoethene), TCNQ (7,7,8,8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethane), or TCNB (1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene)] were studied by variable-temperature (2−300 K) SQUID susceptometry. Mono- and dinuclear species [(PhCN)Ru(NH3)5](PF6)2 (PhCN = benzonitrile) and {(μ-L)[Ru(NH3)5]2}(PF6)4 (L = 1,4-dicyanobenzene (terephthalodinitrile) or pyrazine) were also investigated for comparison and were found to be essentially diamagnetic. Despite the even electron count, both the ruthenium and manganese tetranuclear complexes are paramagnetic, albeit with different spin−spin exchange coupling patterns. The manganese systems are characterized by exchange-coupled S = 1 states at the individual metal centers, whereas the magnetic behavior of the tetranuclear ruthenium compounds results from an exchange-coupling interaction between two S = 1/2 sites, identified as RuIII/RuII mixed-valence pairs.

Google

 


Redisplay in format 

                 

    in encoding 

  
Format for journal references
Format for book references
Last update Tuesday March 26 2024